The British Medical Journal has asked the gambling industry to impose a mandatory tax to fund the effects of gambling addiction.
This is the moment when our serious tone comes in place as responsible gambling matters a lot to us. Gambling damage on society is hugely underestimated according to a new report as are links to gambling suicide. The Gambling Industry should be responsible for addiction cases and it is the Government’s duty to implement new laws.
A new report stated that only £1.5 million is spent in the UK on the prevention of gambling which is merely 2p per capita.
A good example of how this should be done is in New Zealand where the country spends around £9.5 million which works out to be one hundred times more spent per person than in the UK.
There is a voluntary levy currently in place by gambling operators which is of 0.1% of revenues to fight gambling-related harm. Of course, serious operators as the ones we promote abide by this scheme but not all of them do. It is calculated that if all operators chip in they would bring around £14.4 million which can be spent on problematic gambling.
One gambling consultant told the iGaming Post,
“it is always the gambling industry that is targeted as the bad guy, what about drinking, smoking and other forms of addiction, they seem to not have anywhere near the focus that the gambling sector does, even though all those other forms of possible addiction can lead to the same problems as thou connected to gambling.”
“However it is right that only some of the gambling operators pay the levy currently agreed and this does need addressing before it is imposed by the government.”
Let’s face it, the guy is right and we agree with him. A lot of focus is made on the industry yet other addictions seem to be forgotten. Protecting society should always be a case of no questions asked. Online Casinos generate enough money and 0.1% of revenues won’t make much of a difference and it is all for a good cause.
What are your thoughts on this one? We would like to hear what you have to say about this new suggested law.